A claim about any conflict — not just this one — should survive these seven questions before it earns a repost. From EveryClaim's propaganda-detection framework.
Can you point to a primary source that actually says this — or are you trusting a screenshot of a screenshot?
Swap the names of the two sides. Would the same conduct get the same label? If not, you've found a double standard.
Do the numbers actually match the label being used — and is the claim comparing like with like?
Documented policies and orders are evidence of intent; working backward from outcomes alone is assumption dressed as fact.
A claim with the timeline stripped out — what came before it, what triggered it, was the account contemporaneous — is half a claim.
Can you state the other side's argument without turning it into a strawman? If you can't, you don't fully understand the claim yet.
If you anonymized the actors, would the analysis still reach the same conclusion — and would it hold in other conflicts?
Failing a question doesn't prove a claim false — it means the claim is unverified. Share accordingly. Propaganda's favorite move is presenting an interpretation as if it were a fact; these questions pull the two apart.